@Aaron_the_Warmonger I don’t know exactly the long term goal in Italian hands. The only conclusion I can come up with is to give Italy more of a northern Can Opening attack as well as give Italy more money for longer term play. Again, I find this foolish since it serves great use for Germany anyways. It’s been talked about, as said before, I’ve never seen it done and I have no plans to do it if I am ever Axis. I can see Bulgaria going Italian but not Finland.
Can Italy blitz through a pro-allied Nolrtheast Perisa
-
Can Italy blitz tanks through a pro-allied Nolrtheast Perisa from Pro-axis Iraq (hat it already owns) and stop at Caucasus. In others words, can a tank blitz a hostle teritorry with no troups in it, even if it is a neutral.
-
Yes
-
P26 says “by blitzing the tank established control of the first territory before it moves to the next.” If Pro-Allied Northeast Persia has not been “emptied” of pro-allied troops doesn’t the tank have to stop and fight?
P11 seems to agree moving into an unfriendly neutral is considered a combat move and the combat must be resolved.
I do understand right?
The Tank is in Italian Pro-Axis Iraq
The Tank is moving through Pro-Allied Northeast Persia. (Not used to be Soviet NE Persia, just neutral Pro-Allied Persia)
The Tank is ending up in the Russian Caucasus. -
NorthWEST Persia is empty(has no neutral inf).
-
Well silly me answering w/o my map handy
Suggested Topics
