US policy, except under "Bomb if the blue dress comes up"Clinton, is to only involve itself in situations of national threat or US citizen endangerment. We went in because of Saddam’s non-compliance, WMDs, Iraqi people’s suffering and death and (though the Bush Administration will not admit it) oil. Free the Iraqi people to spend the oil on their country insted of SH’s palaces and it will create a new beginning for Iraq and the Middle East (Idealistic aren’t I?)
UN wanted us to stay out of Iraq, but go to Liberia.
EU and NATO wanted us to stay out of Iraq. (Don’t know @ the moment re: Liberia)
The Black Caucus, a US House of Representatives minority group with official space in the Capitol building(the only one of its kind), wanted The US to stay out of Iraq, but go to Liberia.
The US Democrats wanted us to stay out of Iraq. They said we’d lose tens of thousands of American lives(soldiers do that sometimes.) The Iraqi people have lost an average of 25,000 a year during Saddams reignbut go to Liberia.
The Bush Administration is attempting to help in a low-key way. Sending a few advisors to help the governments of West Africa to solve the Liberia Civil War. It will show them they can solve some of their own problems and give the US military a breather.
As a matter of fact, I see no problem letting some UN Peacekeeping forces into some areas/nations after the US/UK/ AUST/POL or whoever has kicked the bejeebers out of the “bad guys.”(I use this term loosely, as, of course, “We have all sinned and fall short of the glory of G-d.” :wink: )