Convoys

[Bigtiti]

jap sub and ANZAC sub in japan seazone
is there damage to the convoy or not?

[kcdzim]

@KH:

… and the attacking player automatically burns enemy IPC’s when the outcome of the battle is victorious and at least one his ships survives.
Correct?

No.  Convoy disruption is done during the collect income phase (not combat phase) of the person that’s going to lose the income.  If you’re japan, and you have a sub next to an Anzac territory, Anzac will lose 2 IPCs during income collection (assuming Japan chooses to do this or is already at war).
@Frontovik:

jap sub and ANZAC sub in japan seazone
is there damage to the convoy or not?

Yes, during Japan’s collect income phase.  So, if Anzac just placed the sub or sent it there, Japan has a full turn to send the boat to the deep.

[KH Stuka]

Thanks for responding Kcdzim.

But what about the first part of my question;
“When the war is already ongoing and a player attacks enemy warships in a convoy markered seazone, no convoy disruption declaration is necessary anymore”.

?

[Krieghund]

Once you’re at war you can assume declaration if you like.  It certainly makes sense.

[BadSpeller]

@oztea:

can subs disrupt a convoy in a sea zone where a destroyer is present?

First one has to answer HOW this destroyer got there at the time of convoy raiding!

If the DD was moved there during Combat Move, then the DD or the sub will be gone (destroyed unit or retreated DD) by the end of conduct combat.

If the DD was mobilized there then the Collect Income is next and the Convoy Raid occurs.

[kcdzim]

@BadSpeller:

If the DD was mobilized there then the Collect Income is next and the Convoy Raid occurs.

you answered your own question.

[BadSpeller]

@kcdzim:

@BadSpeller:

If the DD was mobilized there then the Collect Income is next and the Convoy Raid occurs.

you answered your own question.

Opps….sorry.

[Razor]

@BadSpeller:

Opps….sorry.

Unless you are WOTC - never say “sorry”

[nlentz88]

Can Convoy Disruption occur without a declaration of war?

[Krieghund]

No.