Females playing A&A

My games

https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/38017/global-1942-with-general-6-stars-advanced-game/49

https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/33862/general-6-stars-1941-global-war-game/503

General Tzu would build

1  a sufficient amphibious navy from the UK sea zones, and
2  bombers.

Such a force enables rapid vectors for attack against many Germans targets. More than they can effectively defend.

ïîèíòåðåñîâàòüñÿ ãäå ìîæíî òåñòû ðåçèíû øèïîâàíîé íà 13 ïî÷èòàòü? Èëè òàê ïîñîâåòóéòå ÷òî êóïèòü

Patch everybody is here… not to worry just turn in your work as you have done. We are allmost finished with this… just getting phase 3 stuff finalized for draft. I finished the phase 3 map, phase 2 map, and player aids except i still need to make a new tech chart.

…what do you get?
TROUBLE!
SOURCE :
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=331980&displayTypeCd=1&sideCd=1&contrassID=2

If you go into tactics, then the main reason for the weaker performance of the Me 109 probably was the weak bombers of the germans. I mean, the only planes capable of defending the He 111 or -even worse- Ju 78 was not the bombers themselves but their escorts. So, if the germans had paid more attention to heavy bombers (something that Göring fortunately did not understand), these could have take care for themselves longer and the escorts would have had time to watch their own back also.

I would agree with you F_alk, the Germans just followed different trains of thoughts with the British regarding the use of bombers after WWI. However, my point still stands, I have yet to see stats heavily favoring the 109 over the Spit. If you want to compare the Spit MK II vs the Bf-109 (the types that were used during the BoB), the MK II had speed and maneuverability over the 109 (though the 109 could outclimb the Spit).

Yeah, the all tanks go on land and all ships go on water come especially handy when you’re too drunk to play. :smile: