War at Sea - Preview Card

Right here on this site at http://www.axisandallies.org/taxonomy/term/56

Overwatch is not an official rule, its optional.  Be careful not to confuse the “Expanded Rules” (optional) with the new Revised rules update (which is really only 3 or 4 rules adjustements).

Mot

Try this link over to gleemax.
http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=994177

In his trade list he has “orphans,” that is, cards w/o pieces. You might be able to work something out for at least some of your pieces.

Good luck.

I much prefer War at Sea to the land based minis game.

Pretty simple and plays quick. If you want detailed this one probably isn’t it but it is light and quick and it has the Enterprise!

I don’t know yet. I’ll flesh out the idea more after March 5.  :-)

See here for rules/stats/etc: http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=8233.0

Any feedback is appreciated. The points are fairly arbitary; and will likely change at some time or another. For now it’s just for playtesting purposes.

None of the 1939 units are all that appealing to me, just because it must be limited.  I like to go right into the heart of the conflict, and this one doesn’t measure up in a western theater scenario……although it may be interesting to use in an alternate history or other conflict scenario.

thats my point, things like that all over the place. the MG-42 should be so much more powerfull than the other MG’s. the panzer IV’s should not be able to be distroyed by a sherman head on. I could go on for awhile, but i wont, i shall spare you…

…the type 92 MG didnt appear until 42, not 39. do you really think that the Japenese had better firepower than the Germans!!! ok now i am really done, i need a nap. :x