Kamikaze attacks cannot target a Sub.
I think the main reason for this, is that the Japanese did not do it.
The Japanese code of honour required attacks to be made on (large)warships.
The game reflects this.
It would, I suppose, also go counter to the game’s rule that a Destroyer is required to hit a Sub too.
I hope you and you friend are happy with this answer
Kamikaze
-
The old A&A pacific version includes six kamikaze attacks for a few sea zones.
I used them as fabulos transport-killers.
Will there be kamikaze attacks in the 1940 edition?
-
Will there be kamikaze attacks in the 1940 edition?
Per LH
Kamikazes – yep.
Of course there will be kamikazes – how could you have any fun if there weren’t any kamikazes… It’s a laugh a minute… -
Will the attacks be solved same way?
Are they limited to special sea zones?
Can I make kamikaze in the the first turn?
Do I need real figthers from the game board?
Do the attacks hit on 2 or less?
Question, questions… :?
-
Got to have the kamikazes
-
Of course, hopefully this edition won’t be the “US = time bomb” of the old Pacific. That was fun, but I’m hoping this is a little bit closer in feel to the way the multi-theater A&As feel in that Japan can theoretically become strong enough to fight the US. That of course means Kamikazes will probably be off less importance for AAP40, but we’ll see.
-
Kamikaze’s are fun, but they are an act of desperation.
-
@Brain:
Kamikaze’s are fun, but they are an act of desperation.
Right on dude, they sure are fun. And in this new edition, we will use the same system as in the old edition, with 6 kamikaze raids in the sea zones that are adjacent to the Japanese home territory, and they still will be able to target the infidels.
Suggested Topics
