An Axis & Allies game that combined the overworld map that we know and then a tactical grid/hex that worked like the miniatures for battles would be awesome.
Now that would make an already awsome game even better. Beacause you would have even more control over the battles.
If they do go away from money I’ll be mad but I’ll just use the money from other games. Although it ticks me off that they do that.
But makes you wonder if Hasbro just decided that kids couldn’t do the math unaided.
If we have gotten to that point then its pretty sad.
Another Panzer divison WITH A GOOD SUPPLY LINE!! Thats what killed Rommel was lack of supplies.
US needs to land with one transport and some destroy cover 1 inf and 1 tank as many times as possible in Africa every turn and then turn all attention to Pacific. Russia could also save China by sending 4-5 tanks into china to put a lid on Japan.
Sence I got AAA50 I always play with crusiers even when I go back to AAE and AAP it just makes it better.
Although I agree that destroys price tag should be increased.
Has anyone heard of it? It looks like fun beacause there will be actual stratagy instead of every man for himself. I can’t wait to get a PS3 so I can get it.
Just wondering and please explain.
Personally I like it for the stratagy and the screams and yells when rolling the dice for a major battle. Its also just plain old FUN!!!
Some parts of it would have to be dark and creepy. Cuz its Edgar Allen Poe!
The thing I like about search and destroy is its realistic. And you get tons of experice for each kill. (shot down a Pavelow and got 4,000 experice!!!)
Got 2 AC-130s in one life heheheh.
Now thats evil. My friend once got one from a care packege during search and destroy. Needless to say his team won.
Eh. I guess what I was trying to say is COD blindly shoot in the direction of the enemy, and you might get a kill. Halo - blindly shoot in the direction of the enemy and chances are you are not gunna get a kill. However last night got my first nuke (the real way). So I am starting to warm up to it :-D
Nukes are cool. But the whole blindly shooting at the enemy and get a kill thing is something I like about it beacause its realistic and it gives everyone a chance and no matter what there is always going to be a little luck invovled in everything.
The only buying bombers with Uk and such is pretty evil for Germany and Italy espescially if you throw in Heavy Bombers and long-range aircraft it gets worse but Radar and Aircraft carriers would help defeat the bomber menece.
Usually depends on how tired me and friend are and what time it is whether or not we play to the bitter end.
If Italy can take Africa for IPCs and keep its fleet intact for 4-5 turns Italy can start doing good. One game Germany launched an unsucssesful invasion of UK. Then Italy came out of nowhere and took the UK with one tank left and the US fleet was 3 sz away. Game ending move. Italy has potential.
All I got to say is story mode good multiplayer crapy
The levels are super detailed. The Washington D.C. level is the best after the EMP. Multiplayer is really good. What is wrong with it in your opinon molinar13?
If you want to make waves with Italy then take Africa. Also building your fleet up only a little bit can distract the Allies.
I like both 42’ and 41’. Whenever I play I alternate to help make it so that 2 games are never the same.
The only thing “broken” about this game are the akimbo 1887s. No one in Modern Warfare is going to fight like that, and they have ridiculous range and spread with 1hitKOs. They need to nerf it. You don’t have to be near anyone or practically aim, just fire both in the approximate direction and you’re done.
Its even more so when their is FMJ on it too. The undermounted shotguns have the range to go accross entire maps and my friend got a headshot like that.
This all goes to show that you can have the best plan in the world and it can still fail due to bad luck.
That is sweet. I would love to have something like that. (Although the ping pong table is working well)