Hi, a few of us AA 1940 players are getting together Saturday 23 NOV from 11am to late afternoon. Depending on how many interested we will decide which version to play. New players can learn how to play by partnering with more experienced ones. Will advise of location once you contact me: mikpel@hotmail.com Mike

@fasthard to continue on the example given above: if Germany attacks Yugo but retreats before conquering it, then the Yugo units can’t leave the territory BUT are allied. The Allies (for example, UK) could land a fighter there and then the units become controlled by the UK. Then, the next turn, if they survive (doubtful) the Yugo units are now UK and could leave the territory.

Anyone interested in AA 1940 in the NH area? I live in Manchester but can travel. Have all the game boards and some nice custom pieces, too. Mike

@fasthard CORRECTION: I was incorrect in my first interpretation: Here the Corrected answer please see the other replies and feedback: I am looking at page 11 of the 2nd edition of the European Rule Book for AA1940 under the topic of Unfriendly Neutrals.

Hi, my pal Josh and I are in southern NH and gotten to a level where we want to find some knowledgeable opponents for AA1940 or the new AA1942 Global scenario by Larry Harris (uses the same map and most rules of 1940. We are willing to travel ! Thanks mikpel at hotmail dot com or text 603 660 three four four zero

Hi, my pal Josh and I are in southern NH and gotten to a level where we want to find some knowledgeable opponents for AA1940 or the new AA1942 Global scenario by Larry Harris (uses the same map and most rules of 1940. We are willing to travel ! Thanks mikpel at hotmail dot com or text 603 660 three four four zero

@riewnoiz Hi, we play here in Manchester, NH and now in Danvers, MA. Reach me at mikpel at hot mail dot com. Mainly play the ‘new’ Global 1942 which is like the Global 1940.

@carnevale762 Hi, I didn’t get your email. You can text also.

Hi, my pal Josh and I are in southern NH and gotten to a level where we want to find some knowledgeable opponents for AA1940 or the new AA1942 Global scenario by Larry Harris (uses the same map and most rules of 1940. We are willing to travel ! Thanks mikpel at hotmail dot com or text 603 660 three four four zero

Hi, my pal Josh and I are in southern NH and gotten to a level where we want to find some knowledgeable opponents for AA1940 or the new AA1942 Global scenario by Larry Harris (uses the same map and most rules of 1940. We are willing to travel ! Thanks mikpel at hotmail dot com or text 603 660 three four four zero

Here is a unique take: while an amphibious assault takes place, the defender has a lone (and quite sad) transport in the sea zone. Can the attacker state one of his aircraft will hit the transport so the attacking battleship can bombard and support the amphibious assault? I don’t think the bombardment can take place in this case unless the ‘defending’ transport is totally ignored by air and sea. thanks

@fasthard CORRECTION: I was incorrect in my first interpretation: Here the Corrected answer please see the other replies and feedback: I am looking at page 11 of the 2nd edition of the European Rule Book for AA1940 under the topic of Unfriendly Neutrals.

@fasthard to continue on the example given above: if Germany attacks Yugo but retreats before conquering it, then the Yugo units can’t leave the territory BUT are allied. The Allies (for example, UK) could land a fighter there and then the units become controlled by the UK. Then, the next turn, if they survive (doubtful) the Yugo units are now UK and could leave the territory.

Anyone interested in AA 1940 in the NH area? I live in Manchester but can travel. Have all the game boards and some nice custom pieces, too. Mike

@krieghund But, can Japan scramble against US ships when it is ANZACs attack? That is, what if the US also put some surface warships in that sea zone in its non-combat turn- would Japan have to ‘fight’ them in the scramble or just the ANZAC ships? This is really complicated and might be not addressed by any current rules or errata. thanks (and this is mostly acedemic)

@tincanofthesea just getting back to this scenario: An empty US transport is in an Australian waters. On ANZAC’s turn, two ANZAC units (lets say INF and Arty) load up. On the US turn, non-combat, it sails to Carolina Islands that are occupied by some Japanese fighters. There are no Japanese naval assets in the waters around the Carolina Islands. There is no combat and no assault at this time. On ANZAC’s turn, the INF and Arty ‘assault’ or ‘unload’ and attack the Japanese forces on the Carolina Islands. Wow… this appears to be very unique.