@Krieghund said in AAZ 1942 (second edition) : rules question (inspired by 'Broken, Busted, or Both'):
There is still combat.
Yes. I agree on this.
Still I think this is a bit against the spirit (thematically speaking) of the rules…
AAZ Rule Question: non-combat movement after attacking Zs in an area you control
-
We came across this during a game:
A player wants to move units into an area he controls. This area contains Zs. He/she attacks these Zs. But then, after combat, wants to non-combat move some units out of that very territory into an adjancent territory.
So more in general: may you ‘keep units’ apart when attacking Zs in an area controlled by you?
(With the purpose of non-combating moving these units into an adjacent area. Say to bolster defense there…)If this issue was already tackled: sorry. In that case please post a link here to the answer.
thrasher,
EDIT: We thought this was NOT allowed. We just want to be sure.
-
Page 24: “move any units that did not…or participate in combat this turn.”, You did it correct, and there is no provision splitting units in a single territory into attacking/non attacking.
This sounds similar to subs, but subs are addressed with rules to say that they may move move to avoid combat during their combat move.
As far as I know there is no equivalent to ground units.Page 15 says you can move out to escape combat. -
@Striker said in AAZ Rule Question: non-combat movement after attacking Zs in an area you control:
Page 15 says you can move out to escape combat.
Striker, thanks for reply. I thought about analogy between submerged submarines and Zs too. Seems the analogy is not 100 % though indeed.
Suggested Topics
