Destroyer able to blockade two land territories from one sea zone?

If Japan goes J-1 … DOW on W.Allies… be very careful with the baiting part…
  Unless UK and US are played very accurately, should SeaLion be even moderately successful… If Gib bombed successfully and German Navy survives US3 and UK3 counterattacks…
and Japan takes Calcutta on J-3… things go downhill pretty quick for Allies…

I just looked… turns out you are correct.

Back in the days when destroyers cost 12, and rolled 3,3, +2 for shore bombard. WOW.

yea its pro-allies my bad.

The classic battle board is the only good one and they should have made them all like that.

Thanks.

I thought so, just didn’t recall it being stated explicitly, but then you can’t detail everything.

Overall, excellent rulebook for AAE40.

@GrizzlyMan:

Yeah, you can move land units into the territory on your non-combat phase.

…as long as those land units didnt move in the combat movement phase.

I don’t think there will be any Cdn Army units on the Pacific side.
Canada was totally KGF.

#565

@xzorn:

Having a fleet, planes and a few trannies in the Baltic lets you threaten Britain and Russia, while defending your Scandinavian holdings. Brits will have to be wary of an attack and waste precious resources in anticipation. And if he does, simply use the fleet, airforce and trannies on other things.

So just the threat of Sea Lion is good enough.