Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Russian NO

Axis & Allies Global 1940

770

B

Bigtiti
last edited by

the russians get a NO per originally german territory. does the USSR need to have all of its starting territories to complete that NO?
thnaks a lot
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
A

Alsch91
last edited by

No.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
K

Krieghund Official Q&A
last edited by

In the box rules, yes. In Alpha, no.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
B

Bigtiti
last edited by

okay, that’s already big difference in sealion
makes russia a lot stronger imo
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

165

anniversary

1914

tips&tricks

1942 2nd ed

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

J

Russian non combat moves while neutral

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • japapam

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

524
Views

P

@Navymule:

I stand corrected. However, they (USSR) could declare war upon Japan and then attack a neutral such as Turkey, right?

No again, sorry:

@rulebook:

Due to its separate treaties with Germany and Japan, the Soviet Union is in a unique position in its relationship with the
Axis powers. As a result, if the Soviet Union is at war with Axis powers on only one map, it is still under the restrictions
of being a neutral power (see “Powers Not at War with One Another,” page 15) on the other map, and Axis powers on
the other map are also still under those restrictions regarding the Soviet Union on both maps. For example, a state of
war with only Japan lifts the neutrality restrictions from the Soviet Union on the Pacific map only, and allows Japanese
units to attack or fly over Soviet-controlled territories on either map. However, the Soviet Union is still restricted on
the Europe map, …
G

Russian Doctorine: RED DRAGON

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Gargantua

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

2.2k
Views

S

I’ve thought some more about the details of this strategy. Firstly, it is not advised against a G1 DOW. So if we proceed on the assumption there is no G1 DOW, I like these builds/moves:

place 2 inf in Stalingrad

move the 2 inf in Caucasus to Kazakhstan - China bound.

move a tank to Turkmenistan.

move a AA gun towards China

remaining 2 mecs + 1 tank + planes move towards China.

UK West India inf activates East Persia

That way you can still take Iraq with a G2/G3 DOW.
If there is no G2 DOW, move the Stalingrad inf + Turkmenistan tank to Caucasus and leave Persia for the UK. Take NW Persia USSR3 & Iraq USSR4. With a G2 DOW, Turkmenistan tank activates Persia and Stalingrad inf proceed to the eastern front with Germany. Tac bomber positions to support the attack on Iraq USSR3.
Downside - are too many troops being stripped from the Eastern Front?
G

Russian Subs

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • gperson2

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

893
Views

E

Error, I meant a CA. No CV available on G1.
V

Russian Alpha 3 NO a Mistake?

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • vonLettowVorbeck1914

99

0
Votes

99
Posts

7.4k
Views

Q

Ironically, I agree with Cow on this one. Russia could use a bomber. This alone could balance the game. Maybe a UK sub in the Med also.
N

Question on Russian National Objectives

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Navybrat

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

736
Views

D

My group and I play any territory in Europe so Finland and Sweden are possibilities even Ireland but the soviet union has never taken Ireland. The persian teritories are not in Europe so they don’t count. Technically turkey is not in europe that’s why I think it’s specified. So any territory in Europe plus Turkey. Hope this helps.
K

Annoying Russian Infantry

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • KillOFzee

19

0
Votes

19
Posts

2.5k
Views

T

I am kind of interested in what people are having trouble with these 18 inf that russia can throw towards japan? I think those 18 inf are a lot less annoying than say giving brittain more troops, though giving china more troops at the expense of russia’s 18 inf might be a good change. I honestly like it when Russia keeps her 18 inf on the japan border or near it (18 inf and 2 aa guns less for germany to kill in moscow). If you weaken russia’s power here too much it might be worth it for japan to attack russia’s north. Maybe a good way to test it would be to make a house rule where russia looses 6 inf in the east and china gains 6 inf, but you can only put 1 inf per territory. I don’t know if letting china have the Burma road from the start of the game would be fair for japan? US going 100% japan for first couple turns might prove impossible for japan to beat it china is now significantly stronger with those 4 extra inf yunan plus the extra money and possibility of buying artillery. I see japan as being much weaker on the land since china will be more than just a pain, but a real threat and japan will have to buy more ground to compensate making japans navy weaker and in turn making US’s navy that much stronger. I haven’t played and extensive amount of games, so what do people think about the pacific side of the board and those 18 russian inf? Are you guys having a hard time beating japan as the allies, or keeping japan in check?
B

Russian neutraliy

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Bigtiti

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

996
Views

B

my group is using OOB, till they finally get errata and complete alfa setup ready
they change it every 15 seconds now.
J

Krieghund - Landing Russian units on UK?

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • jim010

60

0
Votes

60
Posts

4.7k
Views

K

They are at war, with Japan, per the original post.

34

Online

17.2k

Users

39.5k

Topics

1.7m

Posts