@SamuriSoilder:

…Axis and Allies Revised Edition… Axis & Allies Revised Board

Rules: …

(1) It is not “classic” Axis & Allies.
(2) It is not pure Axis & Allies Rev.
So, where do you think you should have posted this ?
(a hint, I posted that twice already, both before you posted this)

This is to all those who have a copy of Dogs of War…

Has anyone ever attempted editing the game? Through editing the MAP.DAT file, it is possible to add as many new territories as desired…

I have considered editing it to make a Europe split up much like Xeno Games’ “Europe at War” expansion. It would make for an interesting, and long, game. However, it takes a considerable amount of time to edit the MAP.DAT. There is simply too much work involved doing it by hand.

Has anyone else ever tried to do it? Or perhaps coded some kind of graphical front-end that would make editing it easier?

Just curious. Any comments would be welcome.

-Nyght Shyft

Hi to all AA players !! :D

I play the original axis and allies since a couple of months now. I’m searching some ways to spice-up the game. I wanna knows the pro’s and con’s of buying ¨the wolrd at war¨ expension and also what’s in the box and some exemple of new rules included in the pack beacause i hate to buy something when i really know nothing about it. :-? And if you tell me that this expension sucks, please give me your alternates solutions 8)

Thanks for everythings here !!! :wink:

make more territories !

I read somewhere that until VE-Day, the US was spending 90% of its war production fighting Germany & only 10%(!) vs. Japan. In a lot of ways, this is because Germany was a more high-tech and economically powerful country. With just this amount of material, the US production capacity was so great that they could attack vast island fortresses w/ a preponderance of well-trained men & planes.

Whoa, I do know that the US navy is the Pacific was very, very big.

Still here, just been busy. I spent my time in the middle east during GWI and if they need me, they have my number. I just don’t want to waste my time or life on another half measure that does not engage the enemy with the intent of destroying him. We need to go full measure on this, and we needed to do it 25 years ago when this began.

Stop guessing all my ideas! you’ve guessed a lot of them so far, it’s freaking me out.

I like the rule. But how you would give infantry to any territory with an IPC value less than 2? Overall it can be a potent rule by insurrecting territories deep into enemy territory or taking isolated strongholds without wasting valuable resources. It’ll take some more play testing to figure this one out.