Need help

All done now! Cheers!

Merged now!

@juliusborisovbeamdog
Thanks heaps perfect timing I’m away from home and excited to carry on those games.

Your a star.

@djensen That would have been a great idea, as well as some communication with your players. I picked up up 4 auto forfeits, including two games that had been going on for 10 days. Totally done. I just want my time back.

@barnee I would recommend watching this video: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=446952789235203

Also, try the in-game tutorial and read through in-game help articles.

Another way to look at this is there could be a “view completed phase” button where you could view what your board will look like before proceeding. This would help remove the lines everywhere giving you better vision into what is happening. If we cannot support a “go back” button, could we at least support a “view completed phase” button?

@Eqqman I didn’t say anything about a round 2 timing. It does not exist. Round 2 allies ideally take nordics. R3 is when allies pressure on France and northwest Europe europe is severe. It is Germany’s elective if they want to stack France R3. But realize that stacking requires about 20 units.

Perceptions on biased or non-independent dice are due to a host of human perception biases rather than any issue with calculation. A pseudo RNG library is available in every major programming language. People love to complain about how the dice are “not fair” but never back it up with an empirical statistical test or propose an alternate hypothesis in number generation that differs from a [1,2,3,4,5,6] uniform and independent event space.

The main way to solve user complains would be to implement Low Luck or implement a non-independent number generation. League of Legends implements that latter on critical hit chances where each non-critical attack increases the likelihood that the next attack is critical. Both of these would reduce the variance of the dice distributions.