Do the same thing and add me on Steam and we can work out details!

Jinx - shoot me a PM or add me on Steam (same name as on here).

I seem to be the designated ‘host’ for games and my youtube videos have even drawn the interest of Doug @ HBG. We try to play on a set day, at a set time, for a few hours, but always subject to change as things come up. We have a T-TH group right now and a Saturday group for our European friends.

Even nicer models are being added in the next update to it.

There’s a small community thats play Global War 1936 on TTS - its the much better version of GW anyways!

Yeah, we got that. So ‘liberating’ France goes to the Free-French as far as income etc is concerned.

In our game, the SCW was ongoing when Germany DOW USSR, so Spain is…interesting. Since Nat. Spain turns ‘German’ there are German territories that the Allies can move into.  USSR is holed up in Madrid (mostly just infantry remaining) so it may turn into a USSR Island surrounded by Axis/Allied Territories.

Thats pretty much what we thought, but it wasn’t entirely clear to us. Having the Comintern as a 3rd Alliance certainly adds a different dynamic to the game!

We’ve also come across an odd situation.

France has fallen and Vichy France has been created. It may well be possible for the British to land Airborne in Paris (unoccupied).

Would Paris be considered surrounded in such a state? Germany holds all territory around it EXCEPT for Vichy France, which is Neutral. I am of the opinion that this does not make it surrounded but I am not sure I am entirely correct. (And in the case of France, I assume the same thing applies in regards to who controls each zone? US/UK/French troops can all move through each others territories freely?).

So - an interesting one that we’ve come across.

When USSR and UK/USA are at war with Germany:

Can UK/USA move troops into USSR territory?
If Germans Occupy USSR Territory and the UK/USA ‘liberate’ it - does it go back to USSR or the ‘conquering’ Army?

From the rules:
Lend-Lease: A system by which Major Powers may lend IPPs and units to other nations who are at war without the lender necessarily being at war themselves.

From the USA Country Card:
Can Lend-Lease to:                  Answer:
China KMT                              Once KMT is at war with a Major Power.
Britain / France                        At 15 IPP
USSR                                      Once the USSR is at war with the Axis.

From the rules Page 69 (talking about Spanish Nationalist Tips):
The French may allow the Germans to use their rails for lend-lease units.

So, deduction - The US may Lend-Lease to KMT via the port in Hong Kong once Japan invades China.
The Commonwealth (IE Anzac) may Lend-Lease to KMT via the port in Hong Kong once Japan Invades China.

The port in Hong Kong has a rail that moves in Guangxi Clique.

Correct me if I am wrong?

I am referring to prior to the Burma Road opening, with Hong Kong being the only available port for Lend Lease to be sent to the KMT (the actual KMT ports having been taken by the Japanese).

Because FEC and ANZAC are Military Divisions of Great Britain (Forming the Commonwealth) and share Technology and Lend/Lease Restrictions, we have determined that they can Lend/Lease through Hong Kong. Otherwise, the three would be split and not share Tech/Restrictions etc.

We are undecided on USA lendlease through Hong Kong. However, it clearly states that Germany/Italy can lend-lease through France to Spain (if France allows it) so why can this not apply to USA to KMT via Hong Kong? It meets the factory-to-port/port-to-port/rail-to-territory requirement?

The only instance I have determined where you take a country’s bank is when Paris surrenders to the Germans :

“Free France: The French player creates Free France by
moving the capital as detailed on the French National Reference
Sheet. All IPP currently in possession of the French player are
surrendered to the Axis.”