Humm… If Germany had an aircraft carrier, shouldn’t it be represented in Axis and Allies? :-D Imagine the UK player’s reaction, “What the &^%$#!”

Just don’t play with less than three or four people.  I found the game agonizing because of the way neutrals get ridiculous armies that make them hard to take.  Personally, my friends and I didn’t like it and thought it was untasteful to only supply two thirds of the world so that you have to pay extra to get the rest of the map.

“Ship evacuating 1,000 heads for Cyprus”

While this isn’t a typo, it’s still a humourous misleading headline.  At first I thought, “Why are a hundred heads being shipped to Cyprus?” It was taken from MSN.com.

When your younger, you see adults as smart, and think that kids grow out of stupidity.  Then, comes adolescence, and the scariest thing happens, you realize that the idiot sitting next to you is getting more responsibilities by the day.  My dad and I both agree that idiots shouldn’t be allowed to vote.  Darn universal suffrage, it just causes the suffering of others. :-(

Germany could have won the war if…

• They hadn’t started killing the Jews, it was wrong on so many levels: morally, economicly, and militarilly

• They had invaded Britain in and gone through with Sealion to force Britain to the peace table, demanding that they turnover possession of Egypt and the Middle East so the Afrika Korp could attack through the Caucasus.  In World War I Rommel was a skilled junior officer in a mountain division :-D

• They had all generals ignore Hitler’s military strategy on any level lower than “Attack (insert country name)”.Â

• They voided the alliance with Japan. The United States would have seen it as another European war. Do nothing to anger the US. If a ship is accidently sunk, pay for the ship and its cargo.

@Adlertag:

To let the Allies shere IPC income, will destroy the game for sure, and is a madman idea.

Well, that’s the way I played until the other day.  When my friend taught me the rules he honestly thought the allies could share funds.  I finally questioned it on Friday after he bought 5 fighters and six tanks for the Soviet Union.  Apparently, either he and his dad glanced at the rules about allied soldiers being turned into Soviets when in a Russian province and thought sharing of IPCs was allowed, or his dad just pulled a fast one on him.  (The first time my friend played he was Germany.)  However, before that point we had never used that rule to its fullest extent, since we normally had another player and no one wants to give all their income away.

Go to gamespot.com and check out World At War. It looks like a slightly more complicated AaA.

Check the strategy section.

I think that the system should stay the way it is. The states should ask for assistance. If they don’t it’s their fault, not the federal government. We do not need to have more bureacracy. Personally, I believe it was the Louisiana’s fault the situation wasn’t handled properly along with FEMA. It would be a violation of states’ rights to use Bush’s plan imo.

I play without RR or bids or two hits BBs. My one friend can still win as the axis.