Thanks for the clarification.
Why do you think they made that rule if it’s okay to load from two adjacent territories? Strange, right?
They allow so many other loading options, so it seems bizarre that they would not allow this offloading option.
Thanks for the clarification.
Why do you think they made that rule if it’s okay to load from two adjacent territories? Strange, right?
They allow so many other loading options, so it seems bizarre that they would not allow this offloading option.
A&A 1942 2nd Edition:
Is this a legal move?
Can you split up a transport offloading from Seazone 13? One unit to Gibraltar and one unit to Morocco. In this game, Germany currently occupies both territories, and the transport came from Seazone 8 (France).
The rulebook appears to rule against this move. On page 31:
“Whenever a transport offloads, it cannot move again that turn…A transport cannot offload in two territories during a single turn…It can offload in only one territory, and once it offloads, it cannot move, load, or offload again that turn.”
My concern is that this wording assumes that the transport is moving to another seazone for the second territory offloading. In my scenario, the transport does not have to move again.
If I’m wrong, then I question the rationale for not being able to offload in two adjacent territories if you are allowed to LOAD from two adjacent territories, which is clearly stated on that same page in the rulebook.
Thank you for your thoughts!
A&A 1942 2nd Edition:
Is this a legal move?
Attackers want to conduct an amphibious assault 2 seazones away, but enemy ships block its path in the first seazone. If the attackers first cleared out those enemy ships, can the amphibious assault crew then travel through on this same turn?
Actual scenario:
US Transport in SZ 59 wants to amphibious assault SZ 61 (Kiangsu)
Japanese battleship is in SZ 60 blocking this movement.
US successfully destroys the battleship with other sea units.
So, assuming the US transport stayed back while this naval battle occurred, is SZ 60 now technically friendly for the US transport to move through and conduct an amphibious assault in SZ 61? Or does the US have to wait another turn?