• Some thioughts:

    I start from the OLD Europe Map.

    Yiours has some features that seem Ahistorical …

    AMERICAS

    Canada - I think there wont be that many provinces: merge Newfoundland with Quebec, Merge Manitoba and Nunavut (or whats called)
    USA - I had hoped that the US is split into NewEngland, Old South and Great Plains (add NewOrleans as another VC please ;)
    South America - I think Brazil should start as NEUTRAL Allies leaning…
    Guyana could should be UK, but I think it will be left out.
    I’d suggest to Split Argentine int 2 (Chile)
    Wondering if Equador, Paraguay and Uruguay should be on the map too

    AFRICA

    North Africa looks good to me (maybe a VC to Lybia)

    I do not like the look of the Congo/Nigeria area - I especially hate the SouthWest Africa “label” Its so wrong…
    Another territory carved from the Sahara - Tchad
    Mediterranian- another SZ splitting Corisca and added Baleares
    Malta SZ splited into East and West
    Create SZ splitted to North and South

    ASIA

    Split Transjordan into Palestine and Transjordan
    Split Persia to North and South
    Split Dheli to Baluchistan and Bombay (instead of Dheli)
    Instead Yemen better Aden (in the 40s)
    Add Kuwait as UK posession NOT bordering Transjordan.

    EUROPE PROPER

    I LOVE Green Spain ;)

    AUstria SHOULD CZ and Hungaryare too much in the East

    Austria should be between Bavaruia and Northern Italy and not Bordering Bulgaria
    Italy could be one more territory maybe
    Add Bessarabia teritory- bordering Romania instead of Hungary
    Instead Novgorod /(city) better Karelia(merge karelia/rename

    BTW I loved the Circle treatment of the russian Cities in old AAE ;)

    Yugoslavia should border Greece

    I believe Vyborg should be smaller and Karelia extend to Encompass the Kola peninsula which is now falsely treated as part of Finland

    Finland, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania should start Neutral - Axis leaning IMHO

    BTW - great job you did here


  • “Hey Emperor_Taiki, East Africa – how will this be represented in AAE40?
    Well I think so. I mean the French, the Italians and the British are all represented down there. I mean there’s Kenya, Tanganyika Territory, Rhodesia, Union of South Africa, South West Africa, British Somaliland, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan and an administered from London - Belgian Congo, and that’s just the British stuff… Hope this answers your question.” - Larry

    http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1895

    Those are the names ot the South african UK territores
    South west africa is in there……thats the name, dont wear it out


  • redux…again

    Euro names.PNG


  • But what about San Marino?  They remained neutral during the war…    :-D


  • @valthonis:

    But what about San Marino?  They remained neutral during the war…    :-D

    You sly devil……
    but ive got you!

    its there, zoom in enough and one pixel is miscoloured in italy… :-D

    haha, just kidding


  • You didn’t name the territory in the middle of France.


  • “I am the man with no name…zapp brannigan, at your service”

    whoops on that france thing…


  • Also the upper right Russian territory is missing it’s name as well.

    I am not criticizing, I am only trying to be helpful.


  • @oztea:

    “Hey Emperor_Taiki, East Africa – how will this be represented in AAE40?
    Well I think so. I mean the French, the Italians and the British are all represented down there. I mean there’s Kenya, Tanganyika Territory, Rhodesia, Union of South Africa, South West Africa, British Somaliland, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan and an administered from London - Belgian Congo, and that’s just the British stuff… Hope this answers your question.” - Larry

    http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1895

    Those are the names ot the South african UK territores
    South west africa is in there……thats the name, dont wear it out

    Thanks - I did not know that LH himself confirmed ;)

    BTW - Is it confirmed that South West Africa lies just south of French Equat - Histtiorical I would it put where todays Namibia lies (South of Angola - North of SA)


  • Hey guys, I’m new here.  I assume this will be the AAE40 map?  Its still being worked on?  Release planned for?…D-Day or Gencon?


  • @Jagdtiger:

    Hey guys, I’m new here.  I assume this will be the AAE40 map?  Its still being worked on?  Release planned for?…D-Day or Gencon?

    No this is not the actual gameboard. This is just somebody making their own gameboard.


  • No this is not the actual gameboard. This is just somebody making their own gameboard.

    Oh, ok.  Thanks.  By the way, if I can put my two cents in…maybe there should be some kind of naval(not air) restriction on the Western Allies from going into the Baltic?..such as they need Denmark and/or Sweden?


  • Eireland should be 100% neutral, not pro-Allies
    perhaps even pro-Axis (IRA would cooperate with jerrys)

  • Customizer

    OK, lets rock:

    “SW Africa” on this map should be French Equatorial Africa
    “FE Africa” should be British West Africa
    North Norway goes much further east, but Finland has a small Arctic coastline
    Serbia should be in Yugoslavia, not Bulgaria
    Transylvania should be in Romania, not Hungary
    You need to add Thrace (i.e. Turkey in Europe)

    Russian territory names:

    Vyborg = Karelia
    Novgorod = Ingria
    Orel = Byellorussia
    Belorussia = West Russia
    Smolensk = Central Russia (i.e. Moscow)
    Ukraine = West Ukraine (Kiev)
    Kiev = East Ukraine (Kharkov)
    Karkov = Donbas
    Caucasus = Volga
    Georgia = Caucasus
    Novosibirsk = Donbas
    Archangel = Komi
    Bessarabia = Volhynia


  • It looks like Flashman wants to make just a few changes to your map


  • The names of the russian territory in the far north east is a continuation of the territory on the pacific gameboard

    Thankyou flashman for the names, its a big help….im never realy sure what to call what in russia, when I grew up they were just “the bad guy”

    Ireland wont be an axis ally, thats just a silly pipe dream…just because you dont like your neighbor down the street, you dont help a burgluar break into his house…you might not help him though

    Please dont assume this is the offical map, I take that as a compliement however. Id like to think im somehwere in the 50%-75% accuracy range

    In my house rules I treat the denmark as a “straight”, so you have to control northwest europe to allow acess to that sea zone. (unlike a canal where you need both sides) But I dont think this will happen in E40
    I also dont think gibraltar will be a stop gap sea zone…other than the UK keeping boats there so that it is


  • so far ive managed to squeeze in a few typos in every incarnation of my map

    maybe WOTC would like to see my resume


  • My thought was to have a stright rule for Low Lands/Norway and if they want to send ships across, AA Guns in either territory fire in a 1 round combat at 2. Mabey artillary could fire at 1.


  • @oztea:

    so far ive managed to squeeze in a few typos in every incarnation of my map

    maybe WOTC would like to see my resume

    Don’t forget to wear your best monkey suit to the interview.


  • sadly, I dont think any land territores will prevent sea movement (other than suez and istanbul) just because thats how larry does things, he likes to let combat happen, so you have to think defensively, rather than rest on your laurells behind an invisable wall

    If I had my way….I rationalize straights this way…the straight doesnt actualy stop movement, there isnt a big net they put up or something. What it is, is that straights are conjested enough that if a side controls a territory with a vantage point over the ONLY entrance/exit to the negboring sea zone, then they can give advance warning to their comrades if ships are steaming through (Italians into the atlantic, UK into the baltic) This advance warning would allow the defender to pick off ship, by ship (or task force by task force) as it steams through the narrow gap. WITH advance warning for their air cover.

    The reason why you wont charge a straight is because your sailors would mutiny! they dont know whats in the baltic sea, and they sure as hell arent going to charge through it into the lions den of german air power.

    I favor rules like this…but larry favors hard evidence that you wont attack…like if germany wants to hold the baltic they should build boats…what that creates however is an arms race…germany keeps building boats, so UK has to build more boats, after a few turns, you cant raid eachoters fleets, its either go big or stay home. send all your boats and airpower, or none.

Suggested Topics

  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 9
  • 2
  • 9
  • 4
  • 34
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

77

Online

17.4k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts