• I’m with Zooey…tear down the Statue of Liberty, raise the walls and let the world fend for itself man, cuz it’s not our problem.

    :roll:

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    @Zooey72:

    Hey, I agree with Jen. Frannkly, I am suprised that the rest of the world is helping at all seeing how it is oh so fashionable to hate America. I have not done the search yet, but I am willing to bet that if you searched for “Muslim response katrina” you could find a butt load of pictures of “peace loving good natured muslims” dancing in the street.

    Canada is not the same as the middle east. But you can be sure that thier envy/resentment of America is still a large part of thier society. My cousin was there a couple of years ago and he didn’t want to talk to anyone because if most found out he was American they would give him crap, or just be rude. Hey, thanks for the help, and I mean that with all sincerity. But I am of the opinion that we would be better served taking care of ourselves rather than sending billions in aid to countries who hate us, and once that aid is recieved having the “thank you” be “what, is this it?”

    In short, I don’t want canadian help, german help, or help from our fairy god mother. I want the 300 million back that went to the tsunami. I want the $ back that went to Africa for aids (as if no americans have aids). How can I be so heartless? Are these tragedies caused by americans? Do we have any interest (other than “humanitarian”) with these countries? No on both accounts, so screw em. Not our problem. These people are unappreciative at best, our enemies at worst and they are owed nothing from us.

    If these countries and thier people were REAL allies of the US than that would be different. For example, I have no problem sending aid to Kuwait, both the government and the people are friendly to the US. Same is mostly true of S. Korea.

    I want their help. My entire post was thanking them for every little dollar they had except for one point where i referenced the world’s negative reaction to the billions we sent to help with the Tsunami last year. That’s all. And that reference was only to tell my fellow Americans that we should just be grateful we get anything because NO ONE OWES ANYONE ANYTHING ON THIS PLANET.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    @haxorboy:

    I’m with Zooey…tear down the Statue of Liberty, raise the walls and let the world fend for itself man, cuz it’s not our problem.

    :roll:

    Raise the walls and shoot anyone trying to get in. I like the statue, it’s the only thing the French have ever given us outside of grief, death and war.


  • And without their help we would not have had our independence…so their’s that…

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    Oh yea, their few advisors and couple of last year’s model ships did so much for us. Please. They had their hands full in Europe, they didn’t have time for shit or resources to send to us.

    Get an OLD history book, not this newly revised crap where they add in all this touchy feely crap. France sent some military advisors (who advised fighting in straight lines and hard drill…neither of which won us any wars), guns and munitions which we had to pay for and a few old floating wrecks to augment our fishing vessels so we could pretend to have a navy.

    Later we sent hundreds of thousands of American boys to die on their soil so they could be free from the Germans and we did it twice. Never received so much as a thank you note and to make matters worse, we still have to pay rent on the land our boys are burried under in France! RENT!! They saved them from imperial domination and paid with their lives and WE HAVE TO PAY RENT!

    Personally, I’d say stop sending the money. Wait for them to dare rip the carcases from the ground and then “nuke” the bastards into the stone age. It’s the French, they can’t exactly fight back anyway. You know the old saying:

    “French world war 2 infantryman’s rifles! Mint condition!!! Never used, only dropped once!!!”


  • Later we sent hundreds of thousands of American boys to die on their soil so they could be free from the Germans and we did it twice. Never received so much as a thank you note and to make matters worse, we still have to pay rent on the land our boys are burried under in France! RENT!! They saved them from imperial domination and paid with their lives and WE HAVE TO PAY RENT!

    If we didn’t go over there, you would not be posting on this board as you would be in Russia without the ability to immigrate over here. You better be more respectful of WWII and the American contribution instead of blind ignorant tirad’s against France.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    @haxorboy:

    Later we sent hundreds of thousands of American boys to die on their soil so they could be free from the Germans and we did it twice. Never received so much as a thank you note and to make matters worse, we still have to pay rent on the land our boys are burried under in France! RENT!! They saved them from imperial domination and paid with their lives and WE HAVE TO PAY RENT!

    If we didn’t go over there, you would not be posting on this board as you would be in Russia without the ability to immigrate over here. You better be more respectful of WWII and the American contribution instead of blind ignorant tirad’s against France.

    If America didn’t go over there I’d still be here. Russia would have still won the war, but France would have been like Lithuania or Bylorussia, namely, a puppet government of the Socialists.

    After all, who, exactly, was it that invaded Berlin? Oh yea! Stalin’s forces, that’s right. Who fought the German’s single handedly on his front? Oh yea, Stalin did! Who needed 3 countries to hold the Germans at bay long enough for Russia to win the war? Oh yea, France Brition and America….you see where I’m going with this right?

    Although, I do believe General George S. Patton did have the right idea back in the 1940s. You should have removed Stalin from power and avoided the Cold War all together instead of having to wait for President Ronald Reagan to end it for you.


  • Later we sent hundreds of thousands of American boys to die on their soil so they could be free from the Germans and we did it twice. Never received so much as a thank you note

    If you had ever seen footage from WW2 of the liberation of Paris, you’d know exactly how much crap this is. Nothing but verbal diarreah.


  • After all, who, exactly, was it that invaded Berlin?

    If the US doesn’t enter the war, there is no one for Hitler to fight in the entire Euro theather, so put double as a real safe estimate of the number of German forces in the Battle of Stalingrad and you have Russia losing it instead of the turn of the tide of the war.


  • After all, who, exactly, was it that invaded Berlin? Oh yea! Stalin’s forces, that’s right. Who fought the German’s single handedly on his front? Oh yea, Stalin did! Who needed 3 countries to hold the Germans at bay long enough for Russia to win the war? Oh yea, France Brition and America….you see where I’m going with this right?

    More crap. The allies agreed to let Stalin’s Russia take Berlin. Who was it that sent a massive amount of food, weapons and equipment to Russia so they could lay the hammer down on the Germans? oh ya the Allies.
    I see where you going with this……right down the crapper.


  • @Zooey72:

    …Do we have any interest (other than “humanitarian”) with these countries? No on both accounts, so screw em. Not our problem. These people are unappreciative at best, our enemies at worst and they are owed nothing from us.

    @Jennifer:

    Personally, I’d say stop sending the money. Wait for them to dare rip the carcases from the ground and then “nuke” the bastards into the stone age.

    Yeah …
    i know why there are so many “anti-american” people out there.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    First off, the allies “let Stalin” take Berlin because they couldnt stop him. Patton tried his best and failed to get there. Monty tried his best and failed to get there.

    Secondly, no US in WWII does not drop the entire front. What, is the US army the entirety of the war effort? I don’t think so. Germany would have had to keep almost as many men there to keep the territories conquered AND be ready to repell British invasions should they ever occur. All the US did was speed things up a little bit (maybe 3-5 years.)

    Secondly, the French people were appreciative during the time of the liberation. Afterwards not so much. The government, on the other hand, never - to my knowledge, though maybe it was so trivial it wasn’t recorded anywhere - thanked us for liberating and restoring them. Nor did their infamous leader ever once show anything but hostility to Eisenhower and Churchill, again to my knowledge from books, documentaries and actual live footage shown to me.


  • http://www.ambafrance-us.org/news/statmnts/2000/ww2/index.asp

    That took two seconds to look up on google and I am sure there are many more, but since they are not noteworthy I guess you don’t recognize them.

    Remember we landed forces in France as Germany had rolled all the way over to the coast? If we don’t get involved Germany has alot more reasources available to work on the Eastern front. The US was not the only force present but if D-Day never happened and we never secured a way to get aground for the rest of the countries with that many troops, Russia falls sweety. To re-enforce this, and I apologize for using liberal media source:

    http://www.486th.org/Photos/Misc/stats.htm

    You figure we had probably 40% of our total troop count on the ground in Europe, so that is like what, 6 and a half million troops. Plus without the Normandy landing ( and I am not discrediting any nation here ) I dont’ think the pooled resources of the rest of the allied nations could have secured that or any other coastal landing point to begin a staging area.

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    @haxorboy:

    http://www.ambafrance-us.org/news/statmnts/2000/ww2/index.asp

    That took two seconds to look up on google and I am sure there are many more, but since they are not noteworthy I guess you don’t recognize them.

    Remember we landed forces in France as Germany had rolled all the way over to the coast? If we don’t get involved Germany has alot more reasources available to work on the Eastern front. The US was not the only force present but if D-Day never happened and we never secured a way to get aground for the rest of the countries with that many troops, Russia falls sweety. To re-enforce this, and I apologize for using liberal media source:

    http://www.486th.org/Photos/Misc/stats.htm

    You figure we had probably 40% of our total troop count on the ground in Europe, so that is like what, 6 and a half million troops. Plus without the Normandy landing ( and I am not discrediting any nation here ) I dont’ think the pooled resources of the rest of the allied nations could have secured that or any other coastal landing point to begin a staging area.

    I’m not argueing that the US forces had no hand in stopping Hitler. I’m saying that they were not needed for a victory, only to speed up the victory already fated to occur.

    For instance, if Russia had not been involved but had remained neutral, do you think the British and Americans would have won world war 2? Not a matter of delayed victory, I’m talking victory at all.

    Also, at the time of D-Day, I believe you yankees and limeys already had a European beach head called Italy. You could have invaded up from there instead of adding another beach head in France. AKA you did’nt NEED normandy, you WANTED normandy and it cost you a lot more lives then many other engagements have cost you in past, present and possibly future engagements.


  • I believe you yankees and limeys

    So are you suddenly a Russian again?


  • @haxorboy:

    I believe you yankees and limeys

    So are you suddenly a Russian again?

    you forgot about us canucks.


  • @Jennifer:

    The government, on the other hand, never - to my knowledge, though maybe it was so trivial it wasn’t recorded anywhere - thanked us for liberating and restoring them. Nor did their infamous leader ever once show anything but hostility to Eisenhower and Churchill, again to my knowledge from books, documentaries and actual live footage shown to me.

    It is funny that you also complained about selective memory.

    I have looked around and found a nice webpage. Maybe you (US’ans) are not as bad as i thought (i looked around the page and saw some things where i judged your behavior from my german attitude and based my negative picture on this judgement) :

    http://www.understandfrance.org/index.html

    just be assured: the world is so “anti-american” that you really should start thinking what the billions of people do wrong that they can’t understand you.


  • @Mr:

    Later we sent hundreds of thousands of American boys to die on their soil so they could be free from the Germans and we did it twice. Never received so much as a thank you note

    If you had ever seen footage from WW2 of the liberation of Paris, you’d know exactly how much crap this is. Nothing but verbal diarreah.

    That was right after the liberation. It didn’t even take a decade for Degaul to start being a horse’s ass. In recent years, they have found our cemetary over there desectated with feces.


  • @Mr:

    After all, who, exactly, was it that invaded Berlin? Oh yea! Stalin’s forces, that’s right. Who fought the German’s single handedly on his front? Oh yea, Stalin did! Who needed 3 countries to hold the Germans at bay long enough for Russia to win the war? Oh yea, France Brition and America….you see where I’m going with this right?

    More crap. The allies agreed to let Stalin’s Russia take Berlin. Who was it that sent a massive amount of food, weapons and equipment to Russia so they could lay the hammer down on the Germans? oh ya the Allies.
    I see where you going with this……right down the crapper.

    Sure, lend lease helped. But not so much as is illustrated in our history books. I have never, ever seen a picture of Russians using one of our shermans even though we sent 1000s to them. Why? Because the sherman was a piece of crap compared to a t34, and less than crap when compared to a tiger or panther tank. Same was true with a lot of equipment we sent to them (not so much the aircraft). And don’t forget, at the pivotal year of the war (42) lend lease convoys were being decimated by U-boats.

    I think the Germans could have pulled it off if they only had to fight the Russians. There were 300,000 German troops in Norway alone that could have done wonders on the Russian front (imagine 300k troops defending the flanks at stalingrad instead of the crappy Rumanian troops that were there). But Jen is def right that the Russians did most of the fighting and dying. At the end of the war 8 out of 10 Germans killed were killed on the eastern front.


  • That was right after the liberation. It didn’t even take a decade for Degaul to start being a horse’s a**. In recent years, they have found our cemetary over there desectated with feces.

    I saw a bum take a piss all over the place right outside the Ellipse, should we go to war here with the homeless people? Besides with people like you over here screaming “screw the French” every chance you get I wonder why they hate us and would do things like that.

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

94

Online

17.3k

Users

39.7k

Topics

1.7m

Posts